Utah Mammoth vs Columbus Blue Jackets
Model projection
Mammoth 48%Blue Jackets 52%
Projected score0.3 – 0.3expected goals
Overtime63%chance of OT
Model moneyline+109 / -109Mammoth / Blue Jackets
Market moneyline— / —no stored line
Section edges
Season-level model scores for each side. The higher score owns the edge in that part of the game.
| Section | Mammoth | Blue Jackets | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Office | 300 | 300 | Even |
| Coaching | 223.7 | 204.2 | Mammoth |
| Offense | 276.9 | 201.6 | Mammoth |
| Defense | 324.5 | 336.7 | Blue Jackets |
| Overtime | 284.4 | 309.4 | Blue Jackets |
| Opponents | 80.1 | 67.9 | Mammoth |
| Global | 116.7 | 116.7 | Even |
Metric matchup
The largest gaps between the two clubs across the model's shared metrics, with each side's raw value and 0–100 league score.
| Metric | Section | Mammoth | Blue Jackets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opp Comebacks from 2+ Goal Deficit | Defense | 1 · 0 | 0 · 100 |
| Opp Comebacks in 3rd Periods | Defense | 1 · 0 | 0 · 100 |
| Shot Quality (avg danger/attempt) | Offense | 0.118 · 76 | 0.091 · 0 |
| Opp Average Points Top 9 Forwards | Defense | 1.4 · 100 | 0.4 · 26.5 |
| Opp Average Points Top 4 Defensemen | Defense | 1.3 · 87.5 | 0.4 · 25 |
| Scoring Chances / Game | Offense | 19.5 · 69.5 | 11.8 · 10.3 |
| Shots / OT | Overtime | 0 · 0 | 4 · 57.1 |
| Time with the Lead | Offense | 58.2% · 88.5 | 39% · 59.2 |
| Shots / Game | Offense | 28.8 · 59.8 | 22.3 · 31.5 |
| Opp Scoring Chances / Game | Defense | 20.8 · 24.6 | 24.5 · 0 |
| Shot Attempts / Game | Offense | 55 · 56.4 | 46.3 · 34 |
| First 10 Minutes Goals For/Against | Coaching | 67% · 66.7 | — · 50 |
Open the interactive game page
Mammoth vs Blue Jackets matchup
This page summarizes the NHL Power Ranking model's view of Utah Mammoth vs Columbus Blue Jackets on October 3, 2026. Win probabilities come from the head-to-head engine, which blends each club's stored power sections with goaltending, schedule rest and available roster context. Section edges show where each side owns a season-long advantage; the metric table lists the largest measured gaps.
Team pages: Utah Mammoth power ranking and Columbus Blue Jackets power ranking.