Chicago Blackhawks vs Utah Mammoth
Model projection
Blackhawks 77%Mammoth 23%
Projected score1.6 – 0.3expected goals
Overtime23%chance of OT
Model moneyline-335 / +335Blackhawks / Mammoth
Market moneyline+160 / -192DraftKings
Section edges
Season-level model scores for each side. The higher score owns the edge in that part of the game.
| Section | Blackhawks | Mammoth | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Office | 300 | 300 | Even |
| Coaching | 350 | 214 | Blackhawks |
| Offense | 234.2 | 277.5 | Mammoth |
| Defense | 236.9 | 295.1 | Mammoth |
| Overtime | 341.5 | 284.4 | Blackhawks |
| Opponents | 57.7 | 54.7 | Blackhawks |
| Global | 181.5 | 116.7 | Blackhawks |
Metric matchup
The largest gaps between the two clubs across the model's shared metrics, with each side's raw value and 0–100 league score.
| Metric | Section | Blackhawks | Mammoth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Line Stability | Coaching | 1 · 100 | 0 · 0 |
| Top 5 Players Production Ratio | Offense | 100% · 100 | 0% · 0 |
| Opp Comebacks from 2+ Goal Deficit | Defense | 0 · 100 | 1 · 0 |
| Primary Goalie Game Ratio | Defense | 100% · 100 | 0% · 0 |
| Number of Different Goal Scorers (OT) | Overtime | 1 · 100 | 0 · 0 |
| Shorthanded Opportunities / PK Minute (Proxy) | Defense | 0.6 · 40.7 | 0 · 100 |
| Opponent Shots / Game | Defense | 37 · 0 | 24.8 · 55.7 |
| Bottom-Pair Defensemen Points/Game | Offense | 0 · 0 | — · 50 |
| Powerplay Impacts | Global | 0% · 100 | — · 50 |
| Penalty Kill Impacts | Global | 80% · 0 | — · 50 |
| Losses Despite High Scoring Chances | Global | 1 · 50 | 0 · 0 |
| Scoring Chances / Game | Offense | 13.2 · 21.4 | 19.5 · 69.5 |
Open the interactive game page
Blackhawks vs Mammoth matchup
This page summarizes the NHL Power Ranking model's view of Chicago Blackhawks vs Utah Mammoth on October 1, 2026. Win probabilities come from the head-to-head engine, which blends each club's stored power sections with goaltending, schedule rest and available roster context. Section edges show where each side owns a season-long advantage; the metric table lists the largest measured gaps.
Team pages: Chicago Blackhawks power ranking and Utah Mammoth power ranking.